Author Topic: With Barnegat Bay's survival in question, action demanded  (Read 3703 times)

Offline Pfishingruven

  • P-Man
  • Moderator
  • Super Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10298
  • Karma: +0/-0
With Barnegat Bay's survival in question, action demanded
« on: August 10, 2009, 08:51:22 PM »
Quote
Friday, July 31, 2009
STAR-LEDGER STAFF

 It's choked by invasive aquatic weeds, infested with jellyfish and devoid of clams and oysters that used to support an entire shellfish industry.

The Barnegat Bay, which separates mainland Ocean County from a barrier island of seashore towns, has been the subject of numerous studies, all pointing to the slow death of a fragile ecosystem over the last two decades.

Yesterday, the bay -- a playground for Shore residents and tourists -- was the focus of a joint hearing in Lacey Township of the state Senate Environment Committee and the Assembly Environment and Solid Waste committees in an attempt to restore its health.

"We've actually reached a critical threshold where action is required to protect the bay," said Michael DeLuca, the senior associate director of Rutgers University's Institute of Marine and Coastal Science. "Now it is clearly time to act."

Representatives from many environmental groups said state officials have been aware of the bay's problems for years but have taken no significant steps to correct them.

They worry yesterday's meeting -- like others in the past -- will end up being nothing more than lip service from legislators who lack the interest or the political will to save the bay.

The nearly two dozen people who testified yesterday identified four main issues threatening the life of the bay: nitrogen loading from lawn fertilizers; water intake and discharge from the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station in Forked River; outdated storm water systems; and overdevelopment.

As commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection last year, Lisa Jackson publicly stressed the need to restrict the levels of nitrogen in lawn fertilizers that wash into the bay after rainstorms. Nitrogen promotes the excessive growth of algae and other plants, and deprives water of oxygen for native marine life, a condition known as eutrophication.

Bill Wolfe, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, said neither Jackson -- who now heads the federal Environmental Protection Agency -- nor her interim replacement, acting Commissioner Mark Mauriello, has addressed the nitrogen issue.

But yesterday, state Sen. Bob Smith (D-Middlesex), chairman of the Senate Environment Committee, said he has a bill pending that would allow county or local governments to regulate nitrogen levels.

Shocking many of the committee members with his statistics, Willie deCamp Jr., chairman of the nonprofit group Save Barnegat Bay, said the Oyster Creek nuclear plant pulls 1.7��94;??lion gallons of water daily from the bay for cooling.

Before it is used, the water is screened of nearly all aquatic life and then returned, heated, to the Oyster Creek and eventually to Barnegat Bay.

By the end of one year, the plant has strained 10 times the volume of the bay's 60 billion gallons, he said.

Assemblywoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle (D-Bergen) said she and Assemblyman Reed Gusciora (D-Mercer) plan to introduce legislation requiring Oyster Creek, a 40-year-old power plant that was relicensed earlier this year for another 20 years, to install closed-cycle cooling towers to make the plant less dependent on water from the bay.

Her proposal drew applause from the crowd, but outside the meeting, Smith and Assemblyman John McKeon (D-Essex), chairman of the Environment Committee, said such legislation may be out of the jurisdiction of state legislators because Oyster Creek is federally regulated.

On the issue of development, McKeon said voter approval this November of a $400 million bond issue for the purchase of open space would alleviate some of the development pressures around the bay.

"Preservation is the best way of assuring the health of that bay," he said. "It would be foolhardy for us not to take advantage of these historic lows" in real estate prices.

Several speakers, including Carleton Montgomery, executive director of the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, said that the state needs to protect not only the bay, but also the watershed that feeds it.

He said any further development of the watershed region, already at maximum capacity, would cause irreversible damage to the bay.

MaryAnn Spoto may be reached at mspoto@starledger.com.

Missed this one in the Star Ledger and just came across it online.  Very interesting :-\.

NJ.com Article


Offline Bucktail

  • Just a Jig-alo
  • Admin
  • Super Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12628
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Have jigs. Will travel.
    • NJ Saltwater Fishing Tackle
Re: With Barnegat Bay's survival in question, action demanded
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2009, 11:04:54 PM »
...four main issues threatening the life of the bay:
nitrogen loading from lawn fertilizers;
water intake and discharge from the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station in Forked River;
outdated storm water systems;
and overdevelopment.

I believe that last one is probably the worst of the four.  Just too many people in too small a space.  nosmly


Offline kayak1

  • only at night
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 542
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: With Barnegat Bay's survival in question, action demanded
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2009, 09:17:03 AM »
I have to jump in on this topic

Going back when I was a little kid growing up in Lavallette we always fished the back bay of Island Beach State Park..... If anyone can remember what that area looked like in the 1960's and 1970's...

This entire area was loaded with fish of all kinds and with each passing tide the mash flats would cover over with fresh ocean water.... The salt marsh was alive with nature at its best....

The Barnegat bay had a great tide flow which would push in hard at the Barnegat Inlet and the Manasquan Inlet......This heavy tide flow kept the bay clean by means of fresh ocean water and moving water....... Today some of these areas don't move and water just sits and heats up....WHY no water flow.

The area of Island Beach State Park was loosing beach and sand in the back area of A-21 which has only been happening for hundreds of years its mother nature right....

Well back in the late 1980's the DEP and Army Corp. changed the flow of water in the back bay which caused the problem we have today....NO WATER FLOW.... We need the fresh ocean water to keep the bay healthy..... A-21 is not even close to what it was years ago.....

WE did a great job of keeping the sand in place so we have a place to sit....and we did a great job of holding the water back..... The end result we have a bay with minimal water exchange no fresh ocean water... and nothing but problems like what we have today..... change the flow the way it was and save the bay....oops we cant.

sorry just had to vent
Kayak1
The areas I fish are the ones you said where a wast of time

Offline Pfishingruven

  • P-Man
  • Moderator
  • Super Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10298
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: With Barnegat Bay's survival in question, action demanded
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2009, 09:45:29 AM »
You hit that nail right on the head Dave.  I agree with Bucktail too, over development has really affected the area on even a wider scale than the Bay.  However, the Bay is a great environmental indicator.  Even the earlier and middle 80's the Bay was alive.  I remember the late 80's the Bay fell apart.  It was dirty and full of algae and jellyfish.  We weren't even allowed to wade or seine in it and forget getting off a boat to swim.  Meanwhile, the Beaches were full of garbage and waste.  What a mess that time period was.

That water flow was changed by the Army Corp of Engineers to "fix" the Barnegat Inlet.  We see where that has gotten us...  Back over 250 years ago there was a third inlet that fed the Barnegat Bay...the Cranberry Inlet.  It naturally closed in 1812 and was on the border of what is now Seaside Heights and Ortley Beach.

Hopefully we don't see a repeat of the late 80's 5hrug?

 TT^


Offline sperzonkers2

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 191
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: With Barnegat Bay's survival in question, action demanded
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2009, 10:32:27 AM »
I agree with kayak1, back in the 60's and 70's I used to go with my grandfather and Great Uncle. The bay was full of many different fish and crabs. All these lagoons that they have made I remember all of that being salt marsh that flooded on the incoming tide We use to fish them for the weakfish. Hopefully we can reverse the damage
Bill

Offline ped579

  • NJSF Field Reporter
  • Super Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11408
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Happiness is long casts, tight lines & bent rods
Re: With Barnegat Bay's survival in question, action demanded
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2009, 12:28:40 AM »
Dave I can remember what it looked like in the 50's.  The fishing was unbelievable back there.  I can also remember my parents and their friends complaining about the smell as well but that smell was little to pay for the pristine waters of that era.

Cranberry Inlet used to be a very important pass through to get to the Toms River as it was a very busy seaport with the main goods being salt, charcoal timber and bog iron.  I did some research and the marsh land between Island Heights and the mainland of Toms River was wide and deep enough that the sailing vessels used that as a cut through to get to the town itself.  The inlet used to be right where the A&P parking lot stands today, pretty cool.

It would be great if we had another outlet to the ocean up at this part of the bay, it would bring fresh water and nutrients to this part of the bay and the flushing process would be much better.

I wish all the Geek heads would just leave certain things to Mother Nature, she has a way os working things out on due time, Her Time...

Happy Catching (whats still there)

Paul
IN GOD WE TRUST

"Hypocrisy is not a fault these days - it is a lifestyle"

NJBBA: 4567

Ham Call; N2HYG Monitor RPT.  146.835

Offline kayak1

  • only at night
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 542
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: With Barnegat Bay's survival in question, action demanded
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2009, 07:30:22 AM »
The crazy thing here is that all party's that are fighting for the Barnegate Bay and the Problems its having are all from North Jersey and have no clue as to what this place looked like years ago.

They come down and buy a home and think they can change everything.....This is sure not the same place I was born and played as a kid......

my play ground was the Barnegate Bay or the ocean..... with all that we have today.... no one can figure out how to get more ocean water back into the bay..... If you give me back the fresh ocean water.... I will give you a barnegate Bay full of life.... The real shame of it all is its all about the money and who sits in what office........

This topic is very upsetting..... Because all we can do is blame others for problems we caused to bring in more money for the state..... Its not the fertilizer or the power plant......

again just venting
Kayak 1
The areas I fish are the ones you said where a wast of time


Offline Capt. Birch

  • Sponsor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Fishguts Charters
Re: With Barnegat Bay's survival in question, action demanded
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2009, 01:48:53 PM »
I just recently got back on line and just found this great topic. Yep the bay has issues no doubt about it and there sure are many that need to be addressed. But I differ with many on opinions about the bay.I believe the tide flow is much greater than it was prior to the "new" BI south jetty. I make this conclusion by having kept boats on moorings for over 30 years and having to walk out to get a boat every morning ;D.  Flow rates are very dependant on wind directions around Seaside but we have seen an increase of about 4inches on avg with much more current. This season excluded the fishing in this area IMHO is much better than it was 20 years ago unless all you wanted to target was eels and perch.As far as variety go's again this season excluded the last 3 prior seasons were amazing. One  pull of a seine in a not so great spot would yield kingfish,puffer,short weakfish and large numbers of small drum to go along with the usual stuff. The mullet are still all over the bay but with the "cloudy" water  they are very difficult to net in the numbers that we were used to in the past. In the early 80's many of the " local sharpies" I grew up watching would not even target weakies until the first week of Aug due to low numbers prior to that date. When they did fish them is was mainly soft and shedder crab with crab chum near the old "A" and "B" cans or in front of Beckers. Quite conditions were a must.By the mid to late 90's young kids could get a limit of trout while fishing for snappers off the local piers.  Weakfishing excluded I think the bay fishing  is much better than is was 20 to 30 years ago.The numbers of fish in the bay are unreal. I have a few opinions on the clams and what happened to some of the best beds but they are just opinions.It goods to see a few of the commercal rakeres  back out every morning after a few year absents. I ran a charter a few weeks ago for a group of scientist from a very well known Museum and also a group from an out of state college to get core samples of bottom sediment from  the marshes from the Pt Pleasant Canal to near Tuckerton NJ. Their goal (as explained to me)is to see what the nutrient and pollution levels were 100 years ago in the watershed and how they compare to toady. Hopefully with this type of information people can make the type of choices to protect and improve this wonderful place.

Offline Pfishingruven

  • P-Man
  • Moderator
  • Super Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10298
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: With Barnegat Bay's survival in question, action demanded
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2009, 01:17:35 PM »
Interesting point of view and lots of good information there.  Most of the POV's have been from Shore or close to shore fishermen and not the Bay Boat fisherman.

I would love to hear the results from the research they just did of core samples.  Very, very, interesting.

 TT^


 

NJSFlogofinal1

BSX

terrafin

Heavy Duty truck Parts On Line

Web Site Design

JSBSE_430x80.png

Know Before You Go

Local Weather | Marine Bouy Weather | Inshore Forecast | Offshore Forecast | Interactive Wind Charts | Tide Charts | Sea Surface Temps | Chlorophyll Concentrates | Online Chart Viewer

-

new jersey marine weather forecastterrafin

-